What it tracks
Paragon tracks action, consequence, feedback distance, cost displacement, behavioral change, and whether correction returns to the decision locus that can actually update behavior.
Framework
Paragon is a structural model of adaptive viability. It examines how systems remain coherent when action produces consequence and consequence demands correction.
Its governing claim is simple: a system must update behavior in response to consequence, or consequence will update the system.
Paragon does not treat agreement, insight, apology, intention, or explanation as completed learning. Learning completes only when correction becomes observable behavior under consequence.
Paragon tracks action, consequence, feedback distance, cost displacement, behavioral change, and whether correction returns to the decision locus that can actually update behavior.
It rejects substitutes for learning. Naming a problem is not the same as changing the behavior that produces it. Explanation does not complete the loop.
The public architecture includes the Nine Orbits, Nine Gates, Three Pillars, Golden Compass, Needle, Boundary Protocol, and operational tests.
Many systems preserve local comfort by delaying cost. Paragon asks where the cost went, who absorbed it, and whether the system can still correct before consequence returns harder.